Thomas Bice

22 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers

Thomas Bice
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Health Information Management 100
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 30
  • Family Practice 11
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Karl A. Poterack with:
Karl A. Poterack United States
Seth Meltzer United States
Brent R. King United States
Elizabeth H. Mack United States
Naveen Muthu United States
Jennifer Bosma United States
Christopher Bourdeaux United Kingdom
Deborah Franzon United States
Michael J. Healey United States
Timothy H Gould United Kingdom
Thomas Bice relative to Karl A. Poterack United States Karl A. Poterack's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Karl A. Poterack · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Bice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Bice's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Bice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Bice more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Bice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Bice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Bice. The network helps show where Thomas Bice may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Bice, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Bice Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Bice links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018102
2 202069
3 201940
4 201937
5 201333
6 201532
7 201122
8 201819
9 199916
10 201916
11 202011
12 20209
13 20216
14
How "regular" is the "regular source of medical care"?
19735
15 20224
16 20214
17 19732
18
Evaluation of Physicians' Electronic Health Records Experience Using Actual and Perceived Measures.
20222
19 20172
20 20222

About Thomas Bice

Thomas Bice is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, General Health Professions and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 435 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (8 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (7 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (2 papers), Seismic Waves and Analysis (1 paper) and High Altitude and Hypoxia (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Information Management (100 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (30 citations), Family Practice (11 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Thomas Bice has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Shannon S. Carson, Saif Khairat, Cameron Coleman, Shannon S. Carson, Debbie Travers, Judith E. Nelson, Christopher E. Cox, Saif Khairat, Ross Koppel and Blair Wendlandt. Their work appears in journals such as Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, CHEST Journal, Frontiers in Pharmacology, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Informatics for Health and Social Care.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact