Thomas Archibald

1.9k citations
86 papers · 1.3k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Archibald

80 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thomas Archibald
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 168
  • Organic Chemistry 520
  • Management Science and Operations Research 213
  • Public Administration 53
  • Pharmaceutical Science 66
Replace David Holtz with:
David Holtz United States
Michael Shipman United Kingdom
Peter Jones United States
Thomas E. Glass United States
James R. Cox United States
David Gruen Australia
Binod Nepal United States
Michael O’Neill United Kingdom
Martin A. Smith United Kingdom
J. R. Larson United States
Thomas Archibald relative to David Holtz United States David Holtz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
David Holtz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Archibald

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Archibald's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Archibald with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Archibald more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Archibald

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Archibald. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Archibald. The network helps show where Thomas Archibald may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Archibald, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Archibald Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Archibald links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990156
2 2015110
3 199556
4 199254
5 201643
6 199140
7 199438
8 198937
9 201936
10 198335
11 196631
12 198831
13 199030
14 197028
15 199126
16 196722
17 199821
18 199220
19 201820
20 201418

About Thomas Archibald

Thomas Archibald is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Management Science and Operations Research, Education, Information Systems and Management and General Health Professions, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (27 papers), Educational Assessment and Improvement (9 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (8 papers), Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (7 papers), Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (7 papers), Fluorine in Organic Chemistry (6 papers), Chemical Reactions and Mechanisms (6 papers) and Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (168 citations), Organic Chemistry (520 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (213 citations), Public Administration (53 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (66 citations). Thomas Archibald has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and India. Frequent co-authors include Kurt Baum, R. Gilardi, Clifford George, Adam M. Aguiar, Arnold T. Nielsen, Alan P. Marchand, Simon G. Bott, William M. K. Trochim, Anuj Malik and Marilyn R. Unroe. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Organic Chemistry, New Directions for Evaluation, Tetrahedron Letters, American Journal of Evaluation and Evaluation and Program Planning.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact