Thomas Anger

909 citations
17 papers · 777 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Thomas Anger

17 papers receiving 760 citations

Peers

Thomas Anger
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Immunology 207
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 158
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 149
  • Molecular Biology 210
  • Biological Psychiatry 2
Replace Priyanka Gupta with:
Priyanka Gupta United States
Sergey M. Danilov Russia
James A. Stefater United States
Martin Mæng Bjørklund Denmark
Heike Meýborg Germany
Congzhu Shi United States
Ellis N. ter Horst Netherlands
Sanna Hellberg Finland
Florian Wernig United Kingdom
Thomas Anger relative to Priyanka Gupta United States Priyanka Gupta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Priyanka Gupta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Anger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Anger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Anger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Anger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Anger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Anger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Anger. The network helps show where Thomas Anger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Anger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Anger Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Anger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2004227
2 2012144
3 2005102
4 200482
5 200861
6 200743
7 200727
8 200820
9 200819
10 200716
11 200813
12 20139
13 19965
14 20085
15 20062
16 20141
17
Comparison of aortic valve annulus diameter determination through 3-dimensional transesophageal echo with cardiac MDCT and assessment of predictors for annulus sizing.
20151

About Thomas Anger

Thomas Anger is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Immunology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Hematology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 777 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (3 papers), Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (2 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (2 papers), Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis (1 paper), Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (1 paper) and Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology (207 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (158 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (149 citations), Molecular Biology (210 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (2 citations). Thomas Anger has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Ulrike Mende, Christoph D. Garlichs, Werner G. Daniel, Christian Stumpf, Wei Zhang, Dorette Raaz, Atilla Yılmaz, Josef Ludwig, Christine Reiss and Kerstin Amann. Their work appears in journals such as Experimental and Molecular Pathology, Journal of Biological Chemistry, European Journal of Radiology, European Journal of Heart Failure and JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact