Thilo Weigel

449 citations
18 papers · 343 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Thilo Weigel

18 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Thilo Weigel
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 211
  • Aerospace Engineering 155
  • Control and Systems Engineering 74
  • Artificial Intelligence 109
  • Computer Networks and Communications 75
Replace Benoit Morisset with:
Benoit Morisset France
Beom-Su Seo South Korea
Daniel Claes Netherlands
Chiara Fulgenzi France
Aamir Ahmad Germany
Daniel Fišer Czechia
P. Buschka Sweden
Yoichiro Endo United States
Robert Hanek Germany
Zuo Cao China
Thilo Weigel relative to Benoit Morisset France Benoit Morisset's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Benoit Morisset · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thilo Weigel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thilo Weigel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thilo Weigel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thilo Weigel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thilo Weigel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thilo Weigel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thilo Weigel. The network helps show where Thilo Weigel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Thilo Weigel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thilo Weigel Line = papers co-authored together Thilo Weigel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2002108
2 200153
3 200336
4 200133
5 199926
6 200018
7 200313
8 200013
9 200212
10 20068
11 20045
12 20164
13 20054
14 20044
15 20043
16 20011
17 20081
18 20021

About Thilo Weigel

Thilo Weigel is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Control and Systems Engineering, Aerospace Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction and Software, having authored 18 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (11 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (7 papers), Robotics and Automated Systems (4 papers), Advanced Vision and Imaging (4 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (3 papers), Robot Manipulation and Learning (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers) and Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (211 citations), Aerospace Engineering (155 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (74 citations), Artificial Intelligence (109 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (75 citations). Thilo Weigel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Japan and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard Nebel, J.-S. Gutmann, Jens-Steffen Gutmann, Alexander Kleiner, Klaus Gottlob Müller, Moritz Tacke and Dapeng Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, AI Magazine, Lecture notes in computer science, Advanced Robotics and Informatik-Spektrum.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact