Theodore Evergates
Impact in
Papers in
- Classics 9
- Medieval Literature and History 9
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 1
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 8
- Co-authors
- Malcolm Barber (1 shared paper)Arthur Goldhammer (1 shared paper)Andrew Lewis (1 shared paper)William Chester Jordan (1 shared paper)Susan Mosher Stuard (1 shared paper)William M. Newman (1 shared paper)Giles Constable (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (13 papers)Viator (2 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (1 paper)Speculum (1 paper)University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Theodore Evergates
25 papers receiving 204 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Classics 151
- History 169
- History and Philosophy of Science 34
- Archeology 36
- Political Science and International Relations 72
Countries citing papers authored by Theodore Evergates
This map shows the geographic impact of Theodore Evergates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theodore Evergates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theodore Evergates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Theodore Evergates
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Theodore Evergates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Theodore Evergates. The network helps show where Theodore Evergates may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Theodore Evergates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 89 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 79 | |
| 3 | 1983 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 14 | |
| 7 | 1976 | 10 | |
| 8 | 1977 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1978 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 11 | 1974 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1989 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1975 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2016 | 2 |
About Theodore Evergates
Theodore Evergates is a scholar working on Classics, History and Philosophy of Science, History, Political Science and International Relations and Language and Linguistics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 333 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (9 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (8 papers), Medieval and Early Modern Justice (7 papers), European Political History Analysis (3 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (3 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (3 papers), Historical Economic and Legal Thought (1 paper) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (151 citations), History (169 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (34 citations), Archeology (36 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (72 citations). Theodore Evergates has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm Barber, Arthur Goldhammer, Andrew Lewis, William Chester Jordan, Susan Mosher Stuard, William M. Newman and Giles Constable. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Viator, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Speculum and University of Pennsylvania Press eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.