Giles Constable
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Maureen C. Miller (1 shared paper)Howard Kaminsky (1 shared paper)Donald E. Queller (1 shared paper)Robert Louis Benson (2 shared papers)John Thomas (1 shared paper)David Knowles (1 shared paper)Jacqueline Murray (2 shared papers)Robert D. Benson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (12 papers)Speculum (10 papers)Traditio (3 papers)Viator (3 papers)Revue Bénédictine (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Giles Constable
73 papers receiving 704 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Classics 999
- History 860
- Religious studies 122
- Archeology 227
- Anthropology 148
Countries citing papers authored by Giles Constable
This map shows the geographic impact of Giles Constable's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giles Constable with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giles Constable more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Giles Constable
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giles Constable. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giles Constable. The network helps show where Giles Constable may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Giles Constable, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 115 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 157 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 156 | |
| 3 | 1985 | 139 | |
| 4 | Byzantine monastic foundation documents : a complete translation of the surviving founders' typika and testaments | 2000 | 85 |
| 5 | 1968 | 79 | |
| 6 | 1968 | 74 | |
| 7 | 1953 | 65 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 55 | |
| 9 | 1983 | 54 | |
| 10 | Die Cluniazenser in ihrem politisch-sozialen Umfeld | 1998 | 52 |
| 11 | 1976 | 50 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 50 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 48 | |
| 14 | 1967 | 41 | |
| 15 | 1973 | 29 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1960 | 22 | |
| 18 | 1973 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1965 | 16 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 14 |
About Giles Constable
Giles Constable is a scholar working on Classics, History, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 115 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (44 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (31 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (26 papers), Medieval History and Crusades (20 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (15 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (11 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (999 citations), History (860 citations), Religious studies (122 citations), Archeology (227 citations) and Anthropology (148 citations). Giles Constable has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Maureen C. Miller, Howard Kaminsky, Donald E. Queller, Robert Louis Benson, John Thomas, David Knowles, Jacqueline Murray, Robert D. Benson, Brian Reffin Smith and C. R. Cheney. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Speculum, Traditio, Viator and Revue Bénédictine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.