Th. Klenzner

27 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Th. Klenzner
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 227
  • Otorhinolaryngology 57
  • Oral Surgery 30
  • Sensory Systems 24
  • Neurology 25
Replace Marc van Hoof with:
Marc van Hoof Netherlands
Mai Elfarnawany Canada
Nadine Schart‐Morén Sweden
Bernard Escudé France
Clair Vandersteen France
Ruwan Kiringoda United States
Diana Arweiler‐Harbeck Germany
Max Eike Timm Germany
Ersin Avci Germany
Janny R. Hof Netherlands
Th. Klenzner relative to Marc van Hoof Netherlands Marc van Hoof's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.4×
Marc van Hoof · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Th. Klenzner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Th. Klenzner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Th. Klenzner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Th. Klenzner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Th. Klenzner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Th. Klenzner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Th. Klenzner. The network helps show where Th. Klenzner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Th. Klenzner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Th. Klenzner Line = papers co-authored together Th. Klenzner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200449
2 199846
3 200635
4 200226
5 201124
6
Tinnitus in Cochlear Implant Users: The Freiburg Experience.
199822
7 200420
8 200419
9 200517
10 200413
11 200412
12 201211
13 20059
14 20048
15 20056
16 20056
17 20055
18 20034
19 20044
20 20074

About Th. Klenzner

Th. Klenzner is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery, Neurology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 29 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (20 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (6 papers), Head and Neck Surgical Oncology (3 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (2 papers), Laser Material Processing Techniques (2 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (2 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (2 papers) and Surgical site infection prevention (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (227 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (57 citations), Oral Surgery (30 citations), Sensory Systems (24 citations) and Neurology (25 citations). Th. Klenzner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Antje Aschendorff, Roland Laszig, Ralf Kubalek, Jörg H. Schipper, J. Schipper, Andrea Bink, A. Hochmuth, Alain Morgon, Manuel Jesús Manrique and Norbert Dillier. Their work appears in journals such as Cochlear Implants International, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie, Acta Oto-Laryngologica and Otology & Neurotology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact