Tess Johnson

20 papers receiving 269 citations

Peers

Tess Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 27
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 138
  • Clinical Psychology 58
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 14
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 24
Replace Sonia Mor with:
Sonia Mor Spain
Le Thi Vui Vietnam
Tom Bailey United Kingdom
Allison Golnik United States
Hannah Ainsworth United Kingdom
Sandra Soto United States
Julie Rintoul United Kingdom
Dahlia Saab Lebanon
Jason Van Allen United States
Lael Ridgway Australia
Tess Johnson relative to Sonia Mor Spain Sonia Mor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Sonia Mor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tess Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tess Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tess Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tess Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tess Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tess Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tess Johnson. The network helps show where Tess Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tess Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tess Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Tess Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016144
2 202258
3 202419
4 20219
5 20247
6 20237
7 20226
8 20224
9 20244
10 20214
11 20233
12 20222
13 20222
14 20241
15 20251
16 20221
17 20251
18 20211
19 20241
20 20251

About Tess Johnson

Tess Johnson is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 22 papers that have together received 276 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (4 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (4 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (2 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (27 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (138 citations), Clinical Psychology (58 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (14 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (24 citations). Tess Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Deborah L. McCartney, Karen McKenzie, Kirsty Forsyth, Aja Louise Murray, Marion Rutherford, Iain McClure, Anne O’Hare, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Claire Madigan and Harald Walach. Their work appears in journals such as Bioethics, Public Health Ethics, BMJ Global Health, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy and Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact