Teh‐Ching Chu

405 citations
31 papers · 339 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Teh‐Ching Chu

31 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Teh‐Ching Chu
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Ophthalmology 105
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 98
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 23
  • Molecular Biology 181
  • Biochemistry 18
Replace Mohamed Ettaiche with:
Mohamed Ettaiche France
Alden Mead United States
Michael A. Kapin United States
Daniele Ferrari Italy
Firas Jammoul France
Saumya Nagar United States
William Cheung United Kingdom
Kenjiro Ogawa Japan
Liping Zhou China
Toshio Narimatsu Japan
Teh‐Ching Chu relative to Mohamed Ettaiche France Mohamed Ettaiche's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Mohamed Ettaiche · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Teh‐Ching Chu

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Teh‐Ching Chu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Teh‐Ching Chu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teh‐Ching Chu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Teh‐Ching Chu

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Teh‐Ching Chu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Teh‐Ching Chu. The network helps show where Teh‐Ching Chu may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Teh‐Ching Chu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Teh‐Ching Chu Line = papers co-authored together Teh‐Ching Chu links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200228
2 200225
3
Electrically silent Na+ and Cl- fluxes across the rabbit ciliary epithelium.
198723
4 199420
5 198619
6 199918
7 199315
8 198515
9 199714
10 199914
11 198114
12 199611
13 199611
14 199810
15 200410
16 199810
17 20029
18 19919
19 19908
20 20128

About Teh‐Ching Chu

Teh‐Ching Chu is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Physiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 31 papers that have together received 339 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (10 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (7 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers), Nephrotoxicity and Medicinal Plants (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (105 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (98 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (23 citations), Molecular Biology (181 citations) and Biochemistry (18 citations). Teh‐Ching Chu has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David E. Potter, Oscar A. Candia, Robin R. Socci, Qing He, Joan C. Han, Keith Green, Warren S. Rehm, Grace Han, Charles Gluchowski and Wai C. Wong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Pharmacology, Current Eye Research, Experimental Eye Research and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact