Ted Poston

886 citations
32 papers · 327 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Ted Poston

27 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers

Ted Poston
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • History and Philosophy of Science 122
  • Philosophy 249
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 103
  • Family Practice 13
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 53
Replace Finnur Dellsén with:
Finnur Dellsén Norway
John Koethe United States
Steven D. Hales United States
Patrick Rysiew Canada
Jesper Kallestrup United Kingdom
Michael Hannon United Kingdom
Aaron Z. Zimmerman United States
Peter J. Markie United States
Steven Luper‐Foy United States
Mikkel Gerken Denmark
Ted Poston relative to Finnur Dellsén Norway Finnur Dellsén's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Finnur Dellsén · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ted Poston

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Poston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Poston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Poston more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Poston

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Poston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Poston. The network helps show where Ted Poston may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Ted Poston, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ted Poston Line = papers co-authored together Ted Poston links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201760
2 200949
3 201445
4 200734
5
Reason and Explanation: A Defense of Explanatory Coherentism
201434
6 201425
7 201513
8
Dispelling the Disjunction Objection to Explanatory Inference
20198
9 20067
10 20086
11 20085
12 20205
13 20125
14 20124
15 20114
16 20083
17 20103
18 20183
19 20183
20
SKePTICS WIThoUT BoRDeRS
20102

About Ted Poston

Ted Poston is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Political Science and International Relations and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 32 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (23 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (15 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers) and Karl Barth and Christian Theology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (122 citations), Philosophy (249 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (103 citations), Family Practice (13 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (53 citations). Ted Poston has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kevin McCain and Trent Dougherty. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Faith and Philosophy, Religious Studies and The Southern Journal of Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact