Ted Duncan
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health Policy Implementation Science
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health top 10%
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Papers in
-
- Community Health and Development 3
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health 2
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
-
- Evaluation and Performance Assessment 1
- Co-authors
- Stephen B. Thomas (1 shared paper)Sandra Crouse Quinn (1 shared paper)Vicki S. Freimuth (1 shared paper)Eric G. Zook (1 shared paper)Galen E. Cole (1 shared paper)Charles B. Collins (1 shared paper)Jane S. Mezoff (1 shared paper)Ellen D. Sogolow (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (2 papers)Social Science & Medicine (1 paper)AIDS Education and Prevention (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUganda
In The Last Decade
Ted Duncan
4 papers receiving 537 citations
Ted Duncan's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- General Health Professions 200
- Health 63
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 179
- Infectious Diseases 65
- Clinical Psychology 57
Countries citing papers authored by Ted Duncan
This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Duncan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Duncan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Duncan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Duncan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Duncan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Duncan. The network helps show where Ted Duncan may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Ted Duncan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | African Americans’ views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis study Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 522 |
| 2 | 2007 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 13 |
About Ted Duncan
Ted Duncan is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research, Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Epidemiology, having authored 4 papers that have together received 593 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Community Health and Development (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (1 paper), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (1 paper), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (1 paper) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (200 citations), Health (63 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (179 citations), Infectious Diseases (65 citations) and Clinical Psychology (57 citations). Ted Duncan has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Stephen B. Thomas, Sandra Crouse Quinn, Vicki S. Freimuth, Eric G. Zook, Galen E. Cole, Charles B. Collins, Jane S. Mezoff, Ellen D. Sogolow and Agatha N. Eke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Social Science & Medicine and AIDS Education and Prevention.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.