Ted Christopher

554 citations
24 papers · 424 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Ted Christopher

14 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Ted Christopher
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 250
  • Biomedical Engineering 257
  • Mechanics of Materials 129
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 4
  • Social Psychology 15
Replace Marc Lukacs with:
Marc Lukacs Canada
Mairead B. Butler United Kingdom
J. Borsboom Netherlands
Adamos Kyriakou Switzerland
David Bradway United States
Karin Zell Germany
Carolina Amador United States
W. K. Law United States
Timothy A. Stiles United States
W. A. Verhoef Netherlands
Ted Christopher relative to Marc Lukacs Canada Marc Lukacs's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Marc Lukacs · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ted Christopher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Christopher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Christopher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Christopher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Christopher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Christopher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Christopher. The network helps show where Ted Christopher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Ted Christopher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ted Christopher Line = papers co-authored together Ted Christopher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997184
2 199860
3 199646
4 199431
5 199928
6 199917
7 199912
8 200510
9 201710
10 20205
11 20064
12 20224
13
Modeling Acoustic Field Propagation for Medical Devices
19933
14 20223
15 20092
16 20111
17 20111
18 20181
19 20201
20 20221

About Ted Christopher

Ted Christopher is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology, Philosophy, Mechanics of Materials and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 24 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (7 papers), Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs (7 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (6 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (4 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (4 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (3 papers) and Study and Philosophy of Religion (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (250 citations), Biomedical Engineering (257 citations), Mechanics of Materials (129 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (4 citations) and Social Psychology (15 citations). Ted Christopher has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include E. L. Carstensen, Diane Dalecki and Sheryl M. Gracewski. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Religions, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine and Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact