Téa Glonti

593 citations
5 papers · 142 · h-index 5

Impact in

  • Microbiology top 10%
    • Microbial infections and disease research
  • Ecology top 10%
    • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions

Papers in

    • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions 5
    • Microbial infections and disease research 3

Téa Glonti

5 papers receiving 140 citations

Peers

Téa Glonti
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
  • Microbiology 49
  • Ecology 131
  • Molecular Medicine 23
  • Endocrinology 14
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 23
Replace Dimitri Boeckaerts with:
Dimitri Boeckaerts Belgium
Maarten Boon Belgium
Harindra Arachchi United States
Henrike Zschach Denmark
Sherin Kannoly United States
Leandra E. Knecht Switzerland
Lauren Lessor United States
Brieuc Van Nieuwenhuyse Belgium
Paul Terzian France
Kushkina Ai Ukraine
Téa Glonti relative to Dimitri Boeckaerts Belgium Dimitri Boeckaerts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dimitri Boeckaerts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Téa Glonti

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Téa Glonti's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Téa Glonti with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Téa Glonti more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Téa Glonti

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Téa Glonti. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Téa Glonti. The network helps show where Téa Glonti may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Téa Glonti, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Téa Glonti Line = papers co-authored together Téa Glonti links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown

About Téa Glonti

Téa Glonti is a scholar working on Ecology, Microbiology, Food Science, Molecular Biology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 5 papers that have together received 142 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (5 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (3 papers), Protein purification and stability (1 paper), Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (1 paper), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (1 paper), Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (1 paper), Microencapsulation and Drying Processes (1 paper) and Plant Virus Research Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (49 citations), Ecology (131 citations), Molecular Medicine (23 citations), Endocrinology (14 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (23 citations). Téa Glonti has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Paul Pirnay, Bob Blasdel, Nathalie De Vos, Véronique Delcenserie, Christel Cochez, Marie Hallin, Maya Merabishvili, Olivier Vandenberg, Valéry Daubie and Hussein Chalhoub. Their work appears in journals such as Viruses, Pharmaceutics, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology and Research in Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact