Task Force

405 citations
5 papers · 337 · h-index 3

Impact in

  • Oncology top 10%
    • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
    • Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
    • Gastrointestinal motility and disorders

Papers in

Task Force

3 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Task Force
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Oncology 259
  • Gastroenterology 35
  • Nephrology 14
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 5
  • Surgery 24
Replace David M. Richards with:
David M. Richards United Kingdom
Rodelei M. Siao-Salera United States
Faust Riu Spain
Jan Persson Sweden
Anthony Whitfield Australia
Paolo Gallittu Italy
Waleed Askr Egypt
Eduardo Valdivielso Cortázar Spain
B Jung Sweden
Onofre Alarcón–Fernández Spain
Task Force relative to David M. Richards United Kingdom David M. Richards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
David M. Richards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Task Force

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Task Force's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Task Force with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Task Force more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Task Force

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Task Force. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Task Force. The network helps show where Task Force may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Task Force, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Task Force Line = papers co-authored together Task Force links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown
#Work
1 2006325
2
Latino Student Eligibility and Participation in the University of California: Ya Basta!
19978
3
Research Data Management at the University of Colorado Boulder: Recommendations in Support of Fostering 21st Century Research Excellence
20123
4
Nuclear energy safety challenges in the former Soviet Union : a consensus report of the CSIS Congressional Study Group and Task Force
19951
5
The adolescent, other citizens, and their high schools: A report to the public and the profession
19750

About Task Force

Task Force is a scholar working on General Energy, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Safety Research, Education and Oncology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research Data Management Practices (1 paper), Higher Education Research Studies (1 paper), Citizenship Education and Democracy (1 paper), Global Energy Security and Policy (1 paper), Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper), Nuclear Issues and Defense (1 paper), International Environmental Law and Policies (1 paper) and Educational Practices and Policies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (259 citations), Gastroenterology (35 citations), Nephrology (14 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (5 citations) and Surgery (24 citations). Task Force has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Steven D. Wexner, Bo Shen, Kevin E. Wasco, David E. Beck, Robert D. Fanelli, Todd Huntley Baron, Neil Hyman and James R. Schlesinger. Their work appears in journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and eScholarship (California Digital Library).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact