Tanya Stojkovic

2.0k citations
37 papers · 713 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Tanya Stojkovic

33 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers

Tanya Stojkovic
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Neurology 138
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 150
  • Rheumatology 122
  • Genetics 82
  • Neurology 58
Replace Emmanuelle Salort‐Campana with:
Emmanuelle Salort‐Campana France
Margarete M. Voortman Austria
Tatsuya Shimizu Japan
Yujia Yang China
Takayuki Katayama Japan
N. Knuckey Australia
Karl Ng Australia
Fumiharu Kimura Japan
Ilka Kleffner Germany
Ki‐Bum Sim South Korea
Tanya Stojkovic relative to Emmanuelle Salort‐Campana France Emmanuelle Salort‐Campana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Emmanuelle Salort‐Campana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tanya Stojkovic

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tanya Stojkovic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanya Stojkovic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanya Stojkovic more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tanya Stojkovic

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanya Stojkovic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanya Stojkovic. The network helps show where Tanya Stojkovic may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tanya Stojkovic, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tanya Stojkovic Line = papers co-authored together Tanya Stojkovic links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011227
2 201776
3 200157
4 201447
5 200837
6 200931
7 199825
8 201321
9 201121
10 201620
11 200017
12 201814
13 201714
14 200012
15 202211
16 201211
17
[Bilateral phrenic nerve paralysis, dysautonomia and restrictive cardiomyopathy in a case of POEMS syndrome].
200211
18 201911
19 20058
20 20147

About Tanya Stojkovic

Tanya Stojkovic is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, Neurology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 713 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (9 papers), Hereditary Neurological Disorders (8 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (7 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (5 papers), Neurological diseases and metabolism (4 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (138 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (150 citations), Rheumatology (122 citations), Genetics (82 citations) and Neurology (58 citations). Tanya Stojkovic has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and Serbia. Frequent co-authors include O. Dubourg, Patrick Vermersch, Thierry Maisonobe, S. Herson, B. Eymard, Yves Allenbach, Olivier Benvéniste, Marguerite Guiguet, Maria Isabel Leite and Stefen Brady. Their work appears in journals such as Neuromuscular Disorders, Journal of Neurology, Neurology, Brain and Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact