Tanja Poth

36 papers receiving 666 citations

Peers

Tanja Poth
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Equine 31
  • Small Animals 74
  • Immunology and Allergy 31
  • Immunology 96
  • Animal Science and Zoology 38
Replace W. Feil with:
W. Feil Austria
Nadia A. Ameen United States
Maris Hardee United States
Hee-Tae Cheong South Korea
Sadatoshi Maeda Japan
Johanne Detilleux Belgium
M. Okamoto Japan
Hansjörg Rindt United States
Bettina Heid United States
L. Meagher United Kingdom
Tanja Poth relative to W. Feil Austria W. Feil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×14.5×
W. Feil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tanja Poth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tanja Poth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tanja Poth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tanja Poth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tanja Poth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tanja Poth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tanja Poth. The network helps show where Tanja Poth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tanja Poth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tanja Poth Line = papers co-authored together Tanja Poth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202397
2 202472
3 201068
4 201056
5 201939
6 201031
7 202129
8 201826
9
Equine Multinodular Pulmonary Fibrosis in association with an EHV-5 infection in 5 horses.
200923
10 202023
11 202119
12 202219
13 201017
14 202017
15 201916
16 202016
17 201914
18 201914
19 202013
20 202313

About Tanja Poth

Tanja Poth is a scholar working on Hepatology, Equine, Immunology, Cancer Research and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 700 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (3 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (3 papers), Biochemical effects in animals (3 papers), Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (2 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (2 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (2 papers), Immune Response and Inflammation (2 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Equine (31 citations), Small Animals (74 citations), Immunology and Allergy (31 citations), Immunology (96 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (38 citations). Tanja Poth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Walter Hermanns, Beate Walter, W. Breuer, W. Hecht, Jürgen Braun, ULRIKE MATIS, Heidrun Gehlen, Fritjof Lammers, Duncan T. Odom and Simon Haas. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Frontiers in Immunology, Nature Communications, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences and Veterinary Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact