Tammy Chen

12 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Tammy Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 52
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 117
  • Reproductive Medicine 42
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
  • Insect Science 58
Replace M.A. Warren with:
M.A. Warren United Kingdom
Ann M. Miller United States
Noa Regev Israel
Sharon Layfield Australia
J. Neulen Germany
Faez Siddiqi United States
Monia Gennari Italy
Xi Chu Norway
Sagit Shushan Israel
Tammy Chen relative to M.A. Warren United Kingdom M.A. Warren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×19.3×
M.A. Warren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tammy Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tammy Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tammy Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tammy Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tammy Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tammy Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tammy Chen. The network helps show where Tammy Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tammy Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tammy Chen Line = papers co-authored together Tammy Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2017115
2 201980
3 200471
4 199970
5 202034
6 202013
7 202011
8 20218
9 20234
10 20203
11 20213
12 20082
13
Malpractice Action Stemming From Court‐Ordered Independent Medical Examination
20060
14 20250

About Tammy Chen

Tammy Chen is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Molecular Biology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 414 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gynecological conditions and treatments (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (2 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (1 paper), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (1 paper), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (1 paper) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (52 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (117 citations), Reproductive Medicine (42 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations) and Insect Science (58 citations). Tammy Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Keith Isaacson, Megan Loring, Richard D. Karp, Rebeca B. Rosengaus, James F. A. Traniello, Neha P. Gothe, Agnieszka Z. Burzynska, Jason Fanning, Edward McAuley and Arthur F. Kramer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, Science Translational Medicine, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience and Ear and Hearing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact