Tamara E. Lacourt

20 papers receiving 715 citations

Peers

Tamara E. Lacourt
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Biological Psychiatry 120
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 105
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 163
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
  • Neurology 44
Replace Niklas Joisten with:
Niklas Joisten Germany
Shervin Taslimi Iran
Shenxun Shi China
Kimberly Albert United States
Paulo Marcelo Gondim Sales Brazil
Shifen Xu China
Yukiko Kinoshita Japan
Karen A. Adler United States
Hala Darwish Lebanon
Yori Gidron Israel
Tamara E. Lacourt relative to Niklas Joisten Germany Niklas Joisten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33×
Niklas Joisten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tamara E. Lacourt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tamara E. Lacourt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tamara E. Lacourt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tamara E. Lacourt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tamara E. Lacourt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tamara E. Lacourt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tamara E. Lacourt. The network helps show where Tamara E. Lacourt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tamara E. Lacourt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tamara E. Lacourt Line = papers co-authored together Tamara E. Lacourt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015147
2 2018124
3 2016102
4 201279
5 201743
6 201242
7 201342
8 201427
9 202025
10 201618
11 201818
12 201812
13 201310
14 20189
15 20228
16 20226
17 20243
18 20212
19 20171
20 20181

About Tamara E. Lacourt

Tamara E. Lacourt is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 719 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (11 papers), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (8 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (7 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (6 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (120 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (105 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (163 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (72 citations) and Neurology (44 citations). Tamara E. Lacourt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Cobi J. Heijnen, Robert Dantzer, Jan Houtveen, Elisabeth G. Vichaya, Gabriel S. Chiu, Lorenz J.P. van Doornen, Annemieke Kavelaars, Adam K. Walker, Karen Krukowski and Mats Lekander. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, Psycho-Oncology, Brain Behavior and Immunity, Supportive Care in Cancer and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact