Japan and the World Economy

932 papers and 11.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 932 papers published in Japan and the World Economy in the last decades have received a total of 11.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Japan and the World Economy usually cover Economics and Econometrics (634 papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (429 papers) and Finance (281 papers) specifically the topics of Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (235 papers), Global trade and economics (194 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Japan and the World Economy are Yasushi Hamao, Nouriel Roubini, Paolo Pesenti, Giancarlo Corsetti, Mohsen Bahmani‐Óskooee, Tatsuyoshi Okimoto, Shunsuke Managi, Charles Yuji Horioka, Jong‐Wha Lee and Kwanho Shin.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Japan and the World Economy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Japan and the World Economy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Japan and the World Economy.

Countries where authors publish in Japan and the World Economy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Japan and the World Economy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Japan and the World Economy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Japan and the World Economy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025