Takako Seto

550 citations
21 papers · 483 · h-index 12

Impact in

  • Toxicology top 0.5%
    • Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
    • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research

Papers in

Takako Seto

19 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

Takako Seto
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Toxicology 288
  • Pharmacology 243
  • Clinical Psychology 147
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 44
  • Pharmacology 44
Replace Moonhee Jang with:
Moonhee Jang South Korea
Jaesin Lee South Korea
I.A. Al-Meshal Saudi Arabia
Justin M. Holler United States
Yoshiyuki Sawabe Japan
Misako Takahashi Japan
Ana Y. Simão Portugal
Roland Archer United Kingdom
Anders Just Pedersen Denmark
Hiroyuki Kamakura Japan
Takako Seto relative to Moonhee Jang South Korea Moonhee Jang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Moonhee Jang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Takako Seto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Takako Seto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Takako Seto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Takako Seto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Takako Seto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Takako Seto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Takako Seto. The network helps show where Takako Seto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Takako Seto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Takako Seto Line = papers co-authored together Takako Seto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201187
2 201176
3 201051
4 201251
5 200830
6 199730
7 199227
8 200317
9 197617
10 200216
11 200816
12 201212
13 197611
14 197711
15 201410
16 19919
17 19985
18 19903
19
Difference of components according to dosage forms and change of constituents in the process of preparing extract on Kampo hozai Keishi-bukuryo-gan.
20002
20 19962

About Takako Seto

Takako Seto is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Toxicology, Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (7 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (6 papers), Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis (4 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (4 papers), Food Quality and Safety Studies (3 papers), Phytochemistry and biological activity of medicinal plants (2 papers), Chromatography in Natural Products (2 papers) and Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (288 citations), Pharmacology (243 citations), Clinical Psychology (147 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (44 citations) and Pharmacology (44 citations). Takako Seto has collaborated with scholars based in Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jin Suzuki, Misako Takahashi, Masao Yoshida, Ichiro Yasuda, Ryouichi Nonaka, Takemi Yoshida, Itsu Kano, Hisashi KAMIMURA, Keiko Ushiyama and Fumiko Nagai. Their work appears in journals such as Forensic Toxicology, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Biochemical Pharmacology, Chemistry Letters and Talanta.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact