Tai‐lok Lui

622 citations
29 papers · 352 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Tai‐lok Lui

27 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Tai‐lok Lui
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Urban Studies 67
  • Public Administration 22
  • Sociology and Political Science 216
  • Political Science and International Relations 107
  • Finance 38
Replace Sonia Bertolini with:
Sonia Bertolini Italy
Luigi Tomba Australia
Robert M. Fishman United States
José B. Figueiredo Germany
Filip Wijkström Sweden
Sonja Bekker Netherlands
Barbara Wake Carroll Canada
Howard Handelman United States
Luciana Tatagiba Brazil
Antigone Lyberaki Greece
Tai‐lok Lui relative to Sonia Bertolini Italy Sonia Bertolini's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Sonia Bertolini · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tai‐lok Lui

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tai‐lok Lui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tai‐lok Lui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tai‐lok Lui more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tai‐lok Lui

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tai‐lok Lui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tai‐lok Lui. The network helps show where Tai‐lok Lui may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Tai‐lok Lui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tai‐lok Lui Line = papers co-authored together Tai‐lok Lui links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200476
2 199429
3 201027
4 200823
5 200322
6 201421
7 201521
8 200720
9 201718
10 202011
11
Consuming Hong Kong
200111
12 199910
13 19978
14 20178
15 20186
16 19985
17 20155
18
Waged Work at Home: The Social Organization of Industrial Outwork in Hong Kong
19945
19
Reinstating class a structural and developmental study of Hong Kong society
19925
20 20144

About Tai‐lok Lui

Tai‐lok Lui is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies, Public Administration and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 29 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (10 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (6 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (3 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (2 papers) and Global Urban Networks and Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (67 citations), Public Administration (22 citations), Sociology and Political Science (216 citations), Political Science and International Relations (107 citations) and Finance (38 citations). Tai‐lok Lui has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Singapore and China. Frequent co-authors include Stephen W.K. Chiu, Ray Yep, Gordon Mathews, Eric Ma, Brian C. H. Fong, Daniel J. Walkowitz, Chris Rowley, Ingyu Oh and Godfrey Yeung. Their work appears in journals such as China Information, Urban Studies, Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, Critical Asian Studies and The Sociological Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact