Tae‐Hee Kim

1.7k citations
114 papers · 1.3k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Tae‐Hee Kim

103 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Tae‐Hee Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Reproductive Medicine 170
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 118
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 283
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 155
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 70
Replace Ricardo dos Santos Simões with:
Ricardo dos Santos Simões Brazil
Michael O. Sator Austria
Takashi Takeda Japan
Volker Briese Germany
Jie V. Zhao Hong Kong
Qi Yu China
Yan Wu China
Baha Oral Türkiye
Ines Bucci Italy
Maria Matteo Italy
Tae‐Hee Kim relative to Ricardo dos Santos Simões Brazil Ricardo dos Santos Simões's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ricardo dos Santos Simões · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tae‐Hee Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tae‐Hee Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tae‐Hee Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tae‐Hee Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tae‐Hee Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tae‐Hee Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tae‐Hee Kim. The network helps show where Tae‐Hee Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tae‐Hee Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tae‐Hee Kim Line = papers co-authored together Tae‐Hee Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 114 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012187
2 2015172
3 200786
4 202066
5 201546
6 201939
7 201737
8 201431
9 201527
10 201124
11 201521
12 201220
13 201020
14 201718
15 201716
16 202316
17 201316
18 201416
19 200814
20 201514

About Tae‐Hee Kim

Tae‐Hee Kim is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 114 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (17 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (9 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (7 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (7 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Bone health and osteoporosis research (6 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (5 papers) and Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (170 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (118 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (283 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (155 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (70 citations). Tae‐Hee Kim has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Hae‐Hyeog Lee, Aeli Ryu, Kyung‐Chul Choi, Hye-Rim Lee, Eun Jeong Choi, Myeong‐Sok Lee, Soo‐Ho Chung, Junsik Park, Dong Won Byun and Ji‐Young Hwang. Their work appears in journals such as Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Maturitas, Reproductive Sciences and Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact