Tabitha Freeman

24 papers receiving 628 citations

Peers

Tabitha Freeman
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Reproductive Medicine 538
  • Demography 150
  • Safety Research 101
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 201
  • Gender Studies 99
Replace T. Freeman with:
T. Freeman United Kingdom
Sophie Zadeh United Kingdom
K. Daniels New Zealand
Petra Nordqvist United Kingdom
Emily R Blyth United Kingdom
Ken R. Daniels New Zealand
Floor B. Van Rooij Netherlands
Zeynep B. Gürtin United Kingdom
Loes van Rijn‐van Gelderen Netherlands
Elly Teman Israel
Tabitha Freeman relative to T. Freeman United Kingdom T. Freeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
T. Freeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tabitha Freeman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tabitha Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tabitha Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tabitha Freeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tabitha Freeman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tabitha Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tabitha Freeman. The network helps show where Tabitha Freeman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Tabitha Freeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tabitha Freeman Line = papers co-authored together Tabitha Freeman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010148
2 201682
3 201652
4
Relatedness in assisted reproduction : families, origins and identities
201451
5 201542
6 201642
7 201630
8 201725
9 200824
10 202024
11 201624
12 201621
13 201416
14
Ambivalent identities of single women using sperm donation
201315
15 200313
16 201413
17 201212
18 201211
19 20078
20 20146

About Tabitha Freeman

Tabitha Freeman is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Demography, Gender Studies and Safety Research, having authored 24 papers that have together received 672 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (17 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (12 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (9 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (5 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (5 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (3 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (1 paper) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (538 citations), Demography (150 citations), Safety Research (101 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (201 citations) and Gender Studies (99 citations). Tabitha Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Susan E. Golombok, Vasanti Jadva, Sophie Zadeh, Wendy Kramer, Susan Imrie, Martin B Richards, Miriam Steele, Howard Steele, John Appleby and Lucy Blake. Their work appears in journals such as Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Children & Society, Journal of Family Psychology, International Review of Social Psychology and Fertility and Sterility.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact