T. Shima

3.3k citations
110 papers · 2.7k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

T. Shima

104 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

T. Shima
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 2.1k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 2.2k
  • Condensed Matter Physics 487
  • General Materials Science 74
  • Structural Biology 28
Replace M. M. Schwickert with:
M. M. Schwickert United States
Mark Kief United States
W. Hoving Netherlands
S. Ishio Japan
Yasuyuki Matsuura Japan
Masato Sagawa Japan
N. Kuwano Japan
M. J. Carey United States
E.B. Svedberg United States
J. P. Jakubovics United Kingdom
T. Shima relative to M. M. Schwickert United States M. M. Schwickert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
M. M. Schwickert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Shima

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Shima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Shima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Shima more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Shima

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Shima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Shima. The network helps show where T. Shima may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Shima, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Shima Line = papers co-authored together T. Shima links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011361
2 2002240
3 2002238
4 2004201
5 2003100
6 200698
7 200488
8 200375
9 202063
10 200757
11 201556
12 200355
13 199952
14 200645
15 199841
16 201138
17 200435
18 200633
19 200731
20 200329

About T. Shima

T. Shima is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanical Engineering, Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 110 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetic properties of thin films (93 papers), Magnetic Properties and Applications (79 papers), Magnetic Properties of Alloys (51 papers), Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys (20 papers), Copper Interconnects and Reliability (9 papers), Rare-earth and actinide compounds (8 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (6 papers) and Shape Memory Alloy Transformations (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (2.1k citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (2.2k citations), Condensed Matter Physics (487 citations), General Materials Science (74 citations) and Structural Biology (28 citations). T. Shima has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, South Korea and China. Frequent co-authors include Kōki Takanashi, K. Hono, Y. K. Takahashi, Seiji Mitani, H. Sepehri‐Amin, Tadakatsu Ohkubo, Takeshi Seki, H. Fujimori, S. Ishio and H. Fujimori. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, Journal of Applied Physics, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Applied Physics Letters and Scripta Materialia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact