T. Pearson
Impact in
- Condensed Matter Physics top 10%
- Micro and Nano Robotics
Papers in
-
- Magnetism in coordination complexes 5
- Organic and Molecular Conductors Research 2
-
- Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes 3
- Co-authors
- Danna E. Freedman (7 shared papers)Samuel I. Stupp (2 shared papers)Mark D. Levin (1 shared paper)Balu D. Dherange (1 shared paper)Hiroaki Sai (1 shared paper)Víctor López‐Domínguez (1 shared paper)Mónica Olvera de la Cruz (1 shared paper)Hang Yuan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (1 paper)Chemical Communications (1 paper)Chemical Science (1 paper)Chemistry of Materials (1 paper)Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
T. Pearson
9 papers receiving 516 citations
T. Pearson's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Condensed Matter Physics 135
- Molecular Medicine 31
- Organic Chemistry 177
- Mechanical Engineering 180
- Biomedical Engineering 170
Countries citing papers authored by T. Pearson
This map shows the geographic impact of T. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Pearson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. Pearson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Pearson. The network helps show where T. Pearson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fast and programmable locomotion of hydrogel-metal hybrids under light and magnetic fields Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 244 |
| 2 | Aromatic nitrogen scanning by ipso -selective nitrene internalization Hit paper breakdown → | 2023 | 137 |
| 3 | 2019 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 1 |
About T. Pearson
T. Pearson is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Materials Chemistry, Condensed Matter Physics, Spectroscopy and Inorganic Chemistry, having authored 9 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (5 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (3 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (2 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (2 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (2 papers), Quantum and electron transport phenomena (1 paper) and Advanced Materials and Mechanics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (135 citations), Molecular Medicine (31 citations), Organic Chemistry (177 citations), Mechanical Engineering (180 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (170 citations). T. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Danna E. Freedman, Samuel I. Stupp, Mark D. Levin, Balu D. Dherange, Hiroaki Sai, Víctor López‐Domínguez, Mónica Olvera de la Cruz, Hang Yuan, Pedram Khalili Amiri and Chuang Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Chemical Communications, Chemical Science, Chemistry of Materials and Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.