T. E. Dielman

109 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

T. E. Dielman
Comparison fields: 5 of 164
  • Statistics and Probability 371
  • Applied Psychology 164
  • Clinical Psychology 529
  • Accounting 256
  • Finance 195
Replace Barbara Price with:
Barbara Price United States
Edith D. de Leeuw Netherlands
Jacques A. Hagenaars Netherlands
Marcel A. L. M. van Assen Netherlands
Choi K. Wan United States
George Leckie United Kingdom
Scott M. Lynch United States
Nancy A. Mathiowetz United States
Andrew M. Parker United States
Lars R. Bergman Sweden
T. E. Dielman relative to Barbara Price United States Barbara Price's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Barbara Price · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. E. Dielman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. E. Dielman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. E. Dielman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. E. Dielman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. E. Dielman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. E. Dielman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. E. Dielman. The network helps show where T. E. Dielman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. E. Dielman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. E. Dielman Line = papers co-authored together T. E. Dielman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1986236
2 1997227
3 1987162
4 1991128
5 1990110
6 1984105
7 1983100
8 199393
9 199187
10 200586
11 198986
12 199283
13 199479
14 199458
15
Health locus of control and self-esteem as related to adolescent health behavior and intentions.
198451
16 199650
17 198649
18 198647
19 198740
20 199439

About T. E. Dielman

T. E. Dielman is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Clinical Psychology, Education, Management Science and Operations Research and Epidemiology, having authored 110 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (24 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (16 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (13 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (12 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Statistical and numerical algorithms (9 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics and Probability (371 citations), Applied Psychology (164 citations), Clinical Psychology (529 citations), Accounting (256 citations) and Finance (195 citations). T. E. Dielman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Norway and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jean T. Shope, Amy T. Butchart, Pamela Campanelli, Laurel A. Copeland, Roger C. Pfaffenberger, Raymond B. Cattell, Marc A. Zimmerman, Sharon L. Leech, Henry R. Oppenheimer and Keith C. Barton. Their work appears in journals such as Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Journal of School Health and Journal of Forecasting.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact