T. C. DeVore

780 citations
53 papers · 657 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

T. C. DeVore

53 papers receiving 630 citations

Peers

T. C. DeVore
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Catalysis 99
  • Inorganic Chemistry 157
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 270
  • Materials Chemistry 322
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 55
Replace Philip C. H. Mitchell with:
Philip C. H. Mitchell United Kingdom
Zhenwen Fu United States
Holmann V. Brand United States
Keisuke Miyakubo Japan
Sergey Ph. Ruzankin Russia
L.A. Curtiss United States
A. G. Pelmenschikov Russia
Frank Haase Germany
Shusaku Hayama United Kingdom
P.P. Edwards United Kingdom
T. C. DeVore relative to Philip C. H. Mitchell United Kingdom Philip C. H. Mitchell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Philip C. H. Mitchell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. C. DeVore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. C. DeVore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. C. DeVore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. C. DeVore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. C. DeVore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. C. DeVore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. C. DeVore. The network helps show where T. C. DeVore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. C. DeVore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. C. DeVore Line = papers co-authored together T. C. DeVore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197950
2 197846
3 197431
4 199129
5 197827
6 198727
7 197923
8 197823
9 201821
10 197620
11 197919
12 200818
13 199718
14 201618
15 197617
16 197616
17 199115
18 200714
19 198414
20 202213

About T. C. DeVore

T. C. DeVore is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Inorganic Chemistry and Spectroscopy, having authored 53 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (13 papers), Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds (9 papers), Various Chemistry Research Topics (8 papers), Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (6 papers), Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (6 papers), Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures (6 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (5 papers) and Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (99 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (157 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (270 citations), Materials Chemistry (322 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (55 citations). T. C. DeVore has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include T. N. Gallaher, W. Weltner, R. J. Van Zee, James L. Gole, Barbara A. Reisner, H.F. Franzen, V. Calder, James L. Slater, Ana C. Morales and Jonathan Woodward. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry, Chemical Physics, Inorganic Chemistry and Chemistry of Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact