Swen Wolfram

12 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Swen Wolfram
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Biochemistry 453
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 879
  • Biological Psychiatry 112
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 43
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 140
Replace Theo Mulder with:
Theo Mulder Netherlands
Pon Velayutham Anandh Babu United States
Tomonori Nagao Japan
Yuko M. Sagesaka Japan
Yohei Shirakami Japan
James A. Edwards United States
Periandavan Kalaiselvi India
Yoshimi Kishimoto Japan
Liping Xiang China
Flordeliza Y. Bondoc United States
Swen Wolfram relative to Theo Mulder Netherlands Theo Mulder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Theo Mulder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Swen Wolfram

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Swen Wolfram's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Swen Wolfram with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Swen Wolfram more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Swen Wolfram

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Swen Wolfram. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Swen Wolfram. The network helps show where Swen Wolfram may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Swen Wolfram, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Swen Wolfram Line = papers co-authored together Swen Wolfram links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2006332
2 2007298
3 2006272
4 2005172
5 2006172
6 2011150
7 2012133
8 200072
9 201146
10 201425
11 200218
12 20021

About Swen Wolfram

Swen Wolfram is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Surgery and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Tea Polyphenols and Effects (5 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers), Fibroblast Growth Factor Research (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers), Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases (1 paper) and Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (453 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (879 citations), Biological Psychiatry (112 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (43 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (140 citations). Swen Wolfram has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Ying Wang, Frank Thielecke, Daniel Raederstorff, Peter Weber, Sandra R. Teixeira, Ying Wang, Christoph Riegger, Volker Elste, Joseph Schwager and Nina Grankvist. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, Nutrition & Metabolism, Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, Journal of the American College of Nutrition and BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact