Susan E. Docherty

14 papers receiving 501 citations

Peers

Susan E. Docherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cancer Research 132
  • Religious studies 37
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 79
  • Molecular Biology 321
  • Immunology and Allergy 16
Replace Junkui Ai with:
Junkui Ai United States
Maria Victoria Recouvreux United States
Julia Hoefer Austria
H. Dietrich Germany
Chris Planque France
Humera Khan United States
Wanting Han United States
María Teresa Poblete Chile
Puneeta Arora United States
Miia M. Rytinki Finland
Susan E. Docherty relative to Junkui Ai United States Junkui Ai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.3×
Junkui Ai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Susan E. Docherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan E. Docherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan E. Docherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan E. Docherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan E. Docherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan E. Docherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan E. Docherty. The network helps show where Susan E. Docherty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Susan E. Docherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Susan E. Docherty Line = papers co-authored together Susan E. Docherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002186
2 2005126
3 200482
4 200376
5 200914
6 201412
7 20047
8 20184
9 20133
10 20163
11 20093
12 20162
13
The HSP90 pharmacological inhibitor, 17-AAG, enhances breast-bone metastasis in a nude mouse model and stimulates in vitro and in vivo osteoclast formation
20051
14 20181
15 20141
16 20191
17 20210
18 20150
19 20230
20 20140

About Susan E. Docherty

Susan E. Docherty is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science, Cancer Research and Development, having authored 21 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (15 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (10 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (6 papers), Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (4 papers), Heat shock proteins research (2 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (2 papers), Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism (2 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (132 citations), Religious studies (37 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (79 citations), Molecular Biology (321 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (16 citations). Susan E. Docherty has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include James Donovan Best, Suzanne Rogers, Michael A. Henderson, Erik W. Thompson, John T. Price, E. Michael Gibbs, Maynard D. Carty, Walter C. Soeller, David Ernest James and Maria L. Macheda. Their work appears in journals such as Irish Theological Quarterly, Cancer Research, British Journal of Religious Education, Cancer Letters and Journal for the Study of the New Testament.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact