Sue Lintern‐Moore

32 papers receiving 901 citations

Peers

Sue Lintern‐Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Reproductive Medicine 334
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 635
  • Aging 33
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 128
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 34
Replace Anita M. Mandl with:
Anita M. Mandl United Kingdom
Kurt E. Borg United States
Ming‐Jiu Luo China
Kaoru Kohmoto Japan
J. R. McNeilly United Kingdom
TOSIRO HOSI Japan
Scott C. Chappel United States
O. M. Ohashi Brazil
H. Michael Kubisch United States
Shelley L. Cargill United States
Sue Lintern‐Moore relative to Anita M. Mandl United Kingdom Anita M. Mandl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Anita M. Mandl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sue Lintern‐Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sue Lintern‐Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sue Lintern‐Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sue Lintern‐Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sue Lintern‐Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sue Lintern‐Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sue Lintern‐Moore. The network helps show where Sue Lintern‐Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Sue Lintern‐Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sue Lintern‐Moore Line = papers co-authored together Sue Lintern‐Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1974126
2 1974121
3 1979106
4
Follicle formation in the immature mouse ovary: the role of the rete ovarii.
197392
5 197556
6 197355
7 197855
8 197439
9 197734
10 197833
11 197625
12 197725
13 197623
14 198121
15 197517
16 197217
17 197616
18 198114
19 197813
20 197611

About Sue Lintern‐Moore

Sue Lintern‐Moore is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Agronomy and Crop Science, Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Molecular Biology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 972 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (26 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (6 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (4 papers), RNA Research and Splicing (3 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (2 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (2 papers) and Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (334 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (635 citations), Aging (33 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (128 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (34 citations). Sue Lintern‐Moore has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. P. M. Moore, M Faber, E.M. PANTELOURIS, Anne Grete Byskov, Hannah Peters, Arthur V. Everitt, Harm Peters, A. G. Byskov, C. H. Tyndale‐Biscoe and G. P. M. Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Biology of Reproduction, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, Reproduction, British Poultry Science and The Anatomical Record.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact