Stuart W. Smith
Impact in
- Nephrology top 5%
- Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 10%
Papers in
- Ecology 16
- Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology 5
- Rangeland and Wildlife Management 4
- Co-authors
- Douglas E. Kelly (1 shared paper)René van der Wal (4 shared papers)Sarah J. Woodin (4 shared papers)Robin J. Pakeman (6 shared papers)David Johnson (4 shared papers)Caroline O. S. Savage (2 shared papers)Carolyn S. Feldkamp (1 shared paper)Paul Cockwell (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- New Phytologist (3 papers)The Journal of Cell Biology (2 papers)Ecosphere (2 papers)Plant and Soil (2 papers)Restoration Ecology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Stuart W. Smith
62 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Nephrology 125
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 32
- Soil Science 97
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 114
- Hematology 86
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart W. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart W. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart W. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart W. Smith. The network helps show where Stuart W. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart W. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 120 | |
| 2 | 1964 | 97 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 87 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 81 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 79 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 68 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 55 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 52 | |
| 9 | 1975 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 11 | 1973 | 44 | |
| 12 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 41 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 39 | |
| 15 | 2012 | 38 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 26 | |
| 20 | 1959 | 25 |
About Stuart W. Smith
Stuart W. Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Nephrology, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (10 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (6 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (5 papers), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (5 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (5 papers), Vasculitis and related conditions (4 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (4 papers) and Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (125 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (32 citations), Soil Science (97 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (114 citations) and Hematology (86 citations). Stuart W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Douglas E. Kelly, René van der Wal, Sarah J. Woodin, Robin J. Pakeman, David Johnson, Caroline O. S. Savage, Carolyn S. Feldkamp, Paul Cockwell, Sourabh Chand and R. H. Waring. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, The Journal of Cell Biology, Ecosphere, Plant and Soil and Restoration Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.