Stuart T. Smith

2.8k citations
107 papers · 2.2k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Stuart T. Smith

101 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Stuart T. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Mechanical Engineering 758
  • Biomedical Engineering 816
  • Control and Systems Engineering 435
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 498
  • Mechanics of Materials 341
Replace Tino Hausotte with:
Tino Hausotte Germany
Bongtae Han United States
Tsu‐Chin Tsao United States
A. Mathewson Ireland
D.G. Chetwynd United Kingdom
Alison B. Flatau United States
Hu Huang China
Rudra Pratap India
Martin Gröschl Austria
Bin Zhou China
Stuart T. Smith relative to Tino Hausotte Germany Tino Hausotte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.2×
Tino Hausotte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart T. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart T. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart T. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart T. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart T. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart T. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart T. Smith. The network helps show where Stuart T. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart T. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart T. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Stuart T. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 107 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997216
2 2001171
3 2019165
4 2017110
5 1987104
6 201875
7 200268
8 200555
9 202051
10 201350
11 202046
12 200846
13 198843
14 200642
15 200840
16 200633
17 199131
18 200829
19 201028
20 200226

About Stuart T. Smith

Stuart T. Smith is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 107 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (27 papers), Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques (26 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (14 papers), Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions (13 papers), Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies (12 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (10 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (10 papers) and Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mechanical Engineering (758 citations), Biomedical Engineering (816 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (435 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (498 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (341 citations). Stuart T. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Herminso Villarraga-Gómez, D.G. Chetwynd, Teodor Dogaru, Ying Xu, Vivek G. Badami, D. K. Bowen, ChaBum Lee, R.J. Hocken, R. Seugling and David L. Trumper. Their work appears in journals such as Precision Engineering, Review of Scientific Instruments, Nanotechnology, Wear and Journal of Symbolic Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact