Stuart Leske
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 13
-
- Skin Protection and Aging 6
- Co-authors
- Kairi Kõlves (9 shared papers)Diego De Leo (3 shared papers)Anna L. Hawkes (6 shared papers)Ross McD. Young (6 shared papers)David Crompton (4 shared papers)Katherine M. White (6 shared papers)Louise C. Starfelt (5 shared papers)Ella Arensman (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- BJPsych Open (2 papers)Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (2 papers)BMC Public Health (2 papers)Frontiers in Psychiatry (1 paper)Journal of Cancer Survivorship (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stuart Leske
33 papers receiving 563 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Applied Psychology 115
- Clinical Psychology 237
- Health 66
- Dermatology 40
- General Health Professions 112
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Leske
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Leske's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Leske with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Leske more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Leske
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Leske. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Leske. The network helps show where Stuart Leske may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Leske, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 125 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 71 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 57 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 16 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 9 |
About Stuart Leske
Stuart Leske is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Dermatology, Health, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 632 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (13 papers), Skin Protection and Aging (6 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (2 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (1 paper), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (1 paper) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (115 citations), Clinical Psychology (237 citations), Health (66 citations), Dermatology (40 citations) and General Health Professions (112 citations). Stuart Leske has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Kairi Kõlves, Diego De Leo, Anna L. Hawkes, Ross McD. Young, David Crompton, Katherine M. White, Louise C. Starfelt, Ella Arensman, Kyra Hamilton and Xiang‐Yu Hou. Their work appears in journals such as BJPsych Open, Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, BMC Public Health, Frontiers in Psychiatry and Journal of Cancer Survivorship.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.