Stuart Fuller
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Face Recognition and Perception
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 9
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 7
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
- Face Recognition and Perception 1
-
- Color perception and design 2
- Co-authors
- Marisa Carrasco (6 shared papers)Taosheng Liu (1 shared paper)Yunsoo Park (1 shared paper)Benjamin T. Backus (5 shared papers)Samantha Chen (2 shared papers)Soyeon Kim (2 shared papers)Umesh Jain (2 shared papers)Rosemary Tannock (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Vision (5 papers)Vision Research (2 papers)Behavioral and Brain Functions (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Stuart Fuller
12 papers receiving 328 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Cognitive Neuroscience 299
- Sensory Systems 29
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 63
- Social Psychology 65
- General Decision Sciences 5
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Fuller
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Fuller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Fuller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Fuller. The network helps show where Stuart Fuller may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 98 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 88 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 64 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 1 |
About Stuart Fuller
Stuart Fuller is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 paper) and Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (299 citations), Sensory Systems (29 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (63 citations), Social Psychology (65 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). Stuart Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marisa Carrasco, Taosheng Liu, Yunsoo Park, Benjamin T. Backus, Samantha Chen, Soyeon Kim, Umesh Jain, Rosemary Tannock, Anshul Jain and Loes van Dam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Vision Research, Behavioral and Brain Functions, PLoS ONE and Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.