Stuart Fuller
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Neural dynamics and brain function
- Face Recognition and Perception
- Sensory Systems top 10%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Papers in
-
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms 8
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 5
- Neural dynamics and brain function 3
- Tactile and Sensory Interactions 1
- Face Recognition and Perception 1
-
- Color perception and design 2
- Co-authors
- Marisa Carrasco (6 shared papers)Taosheng Liu (1 shared paper)Yunsoo Park (1 shared paper)Benjamin T. Backus (5 shared papers)Soyeon Kim (2 shared papers)Rosemary Tannock (2 shared papers)Umesh Jain (2 shared papers)Samantha Chen (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Vision (5 papers)Vision Research (2 papers)Behavioral and Brain Functions (2 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Stuart Fuller
12 papers receiving 337 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Cognitive Neuroscience 300
- Sensory Systems 30
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 67
- Social Psychology 67
- General Decision Sciences 5
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Fuller
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Fuller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Fuller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Fuller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Fuller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Fuller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Fuller. The network helps show where Stuart Fuller may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Fuller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 106 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 93 | |
| 3 | 2006 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 43 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 1 |
About Stuart Fuller
Stuart Fuller is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 12 papers that have together received 352 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Color perception and design (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (1 paper), Color Science and Applications (1 paper) and Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (300 citations), Sensory Systems (30 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (67 citations), Social Psychology (67 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). Stuart Fuller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Marisa Carrasco, Taosheng Liu, Yunsoo Park, Benjamin T. Backus, Soyeon Kim, Rosemary Tannock, Umesh Jain, Samantha Chen, Anshul Jain and Loes van Dam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vision, Vision Research, Behavioral and Brain Functions, PLoS ONE and Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.