Stuart D. Scott

32 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

Stuart D. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Algebra and Number Theory 102
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 34
  • Immunology and Allergy 47
  • Cancer Research 69
  • Space and Planetary Science 6
Replace Gillian Hutchinson with:
Gillian Hutchinson United Kingdom
Raphael Sung United States
Daniel Léonard United States
Hugh B. Manning United Kingdom
Lydia Sánchez Spain
Ivo R. Horn Netherlands
Zhenwei Qiu China
Jonathan M. Bloom United States
Janet Watson Kazakhstan
M. Lourdes Sampietro Netherlands
Stuart D. Scott relative to Gillian Hutchinson United Kingdom Gillian Hutchinson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Gillian Hutchinson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart D. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart D. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart D. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart D. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart D. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart D. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart D. Scott. The network helps show where Stuart D. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Stuart D. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart D. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Stuart D. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004192
2 196580
3 198031
4 197119
5 196911
6 199711
7 19955
8 19725
9 19955
10 19735
11
TREE-RING DATING IN MEXICO
19635
12 19794
13 19804
14 20194
15 20054
16 19914
17 20104
18 19744
19 19814
20 20113

About Stuart D. Scott

Stuart D. Scott is a scholar working on Algebra and Number Theory, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Geometry and Topology, Anthropology and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rings, Modules, and Algebras (22 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (17 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (6 papers), Archaeology and Natural History (5 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (4 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (3 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (2 papers) and American Environmental and Regional History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (102 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (34 citations), Immunology and Allergy (47 citations), Cancer Research (69 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (6 citations). Stuart D. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. West, Robert Wauchope, Anne Girling, Dylan R. Edwards, J. Louise Jones, Sarah Porter, Elaine M. Sassoon, Richard Y. Ball, Mark R. Williams and Gary L. Peterson. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, Journal of Field Archaeology, Journal of the London Mathematical Society, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Ethnohistory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact