Steven Hecht
Impact in
- Microbiology top 2%
- Actinomycetales infections and treatment
- Small Animals top 5%
- Infectious Diseases and Mycology
- Animal health and immunology
Papers in
-
- Infectious Diseases and Mycology 4
-
- Actinomycetales infections and treatment 2
- Co-authors
- James C. DeMartini (5 shared papers)Sancai Xie (1 shared paper)Jonathan A. Green (1 shared paper)Bożena Szafrańska (1 shared paper)R. Michael Roberts (1 shared paper)Kim E. Stedman (1 shared paper)J. O. Carlson (1 shared paper)Jonathan O. Carlson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2 papers)Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics (1 paper)Virus Research (1 paper)Cancer (1 paper)Virology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Steven Hecht
8 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Microbiology 46
- Small Animals 125
- Agronomy and Crop Science 80
- Cancer Research 76
- Genetics 118
Countries citing papers authored by Steven Hecht
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Hecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Hecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Hecht more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Hecht
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Hecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Hecht. The network helps show where Steven Hecht may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Steven Hecht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 158 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 68 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 41 | |
| 4 | 1998 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1992 | 8 | |
| 8 | Production of an MHC class II B molecular probe in the turkey, Meleagris gallopavo. | 2003 | 5 |
About Steven Hecht
Steven Hecht is a scholar working on Small Animals, Microbiology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Animal Science and Zoology and Oncology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 351 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Infectious Diseases and Mycology (4 papers), Actinomycetales infections and treatment (2 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (2 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (2 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (1 paper), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (1 paper) and Animal Virus Infections Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (46 citations), Small Animals (125 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (80 citations), Cancer Research (76 citations) and Genetics (118 citations). Steven Hecht has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James C. DeMartini, Sancai Xie, Jonathan A. Green, Bożena Szafrańska, R. Michael Roberts, Kim E. Stedman, J. O. Carlson, Jonathan O. Carlson, Richard Buchholz and Ann M. Findley. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Virus Research, Cancer and Virology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.