Steven G. Docimo

131 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

Steven G. Docimo
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Urology 1.1k
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.4k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 332
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 1.4k
  • Surgery 1.6k
Replace Mark C. Adams with:
Mark C. Adams United States
Serdar Tekgül Türkiye
H. Gil Rushton United States
Raimund Stein Germany
Alan D. Perlmutter United States
Lane S. Palmer United States
Richard C. Rink United States
Paul A. Merguerian United States
Duncan T. Wilcox United States
Douglas A. Canning United States
Steven G. Docimo relative to Mark C. Adams United States Mark C. Adams's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Mark C. Adams · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven G. Docimo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven G. Docimo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven G. Docimo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven G. Docimo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven G. Docimo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven G. Docimo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven G. Docimo. The network helps show where Steven G. Docimo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven G. Docimo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven G. Docimo Line = papers co-authored together Steven G. Docimo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 138 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998312
2 1998287
3 1995223
4 1989186
5 2001158
6 2000145
7 2000144
8 1997143
9 1999121
10 2007113
11 2015106
12 1996104
13 199798
14 200772
15 199571
16 200865
17
The undescended testicle: diagnosis and management.
200064
18 200863
19 199563
20 199855

About Steven G. Docimo

Steven G. Docimo is a scholar working on Urology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 138 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urological Disorders and Treatments (48 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (40 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (14 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (14 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (12 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (10 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (9 papers) and Hernia repair and management (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (1.1k citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.4k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (332 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.4k citations) and Surgery (1.6k citations). Steven G. Docimo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Stephen V. Jackman, Louis Raphael Kavoussi, Robert G. Moore, Sean P. Hedican, William C. DeWolf, Craig A. Peters, Marc C. Smaldone, Ranjiv Mathews, Richard I. Silver and Jeffrey A. Cadeddu. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Urology, Journal of Pediatric Urology, Surgical Endoscopy and Urologic Clinics of North America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact