Steven E. Rhoads
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Gender Diversity and Inequality
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Papers in
-
- Financial Reporting and Valuation Research 2
-
- Income, Poverty, and Inequality 1
- Co-authors
- Christopher Rhoads (1 shared paper)James M. Ferris (1 shared paper)Carl J. Cuneo (1 shared paper)John Van Reenen (1 shared paper)Robert Whaples (1 shared paper)Lawrence D. Longley (1 shared paper)Paul Sabatier (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Public Administration Review (3 papers)Journal of Public Policy (1 paper)Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (1 paper)The Economic Journal (1 paper)Labour / Le Travail (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Steven E. Rhoads
16 papers receiving 193 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Gender Studies 53
- Public Administration 17
- General Decision Sciences 9
- Economics and Econometrics 63
- Safety Research 15
Countries citing papers authored by Steven E. Rhoads
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven E. Rhoads's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven E. Rhoads with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven E. Rhoads more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven E. Rhoads
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven E. Rhoads. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven E. Rhoads. The network helps show where Steven E. Rhoads may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Steven E. Rhoads, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taking Sex Differences Seriously | 2004 | 56 |
| 2 | 2012 | 46 | |
| 3 | The economist's view of the world : government, markets, and public policy | 1985 | 44 |
| 4 | 1986 | 36 | |
| 5 | How Much Should We Spend to Save a Life | 1978 | 13 |
| 6 | 1993 | 9 | |
| 7 | Valuing Life: Public Policy Dilemmas | 1982 | 9 |
| 8 | 1978 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1994 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1974 | 1 |
About Steven E. Rhoads
Steven E. Rhoads is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Gender Studies, having authored 16 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (2 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Legal and Constitutional Studies (1 paper), Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (1 paper), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (1 paper), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (1 paper), Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (53 citations), Public Administration (17 citations), General Decision Sciences (9 citations), Economics and Econometrics (63 citations) and Safety Research (15 citations). Steven E. Rhoads has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Rhoads, James M. Ferris, Carl J. Cuneo, John Van Reenen, Robert Whaples, Lawrence D. Longley and Paul Sabatier. Their work appears in journals such as Public Administration Review, Journal of Public Policy, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The Economic Journal and Labour / Le Travail.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.