Steven E. Meredith

24 papers receiving 553 citations

Peers

Steven E. Meredith
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • General Decision Sciences 32
  • Applied Psychology 54
  • Pharmacology 122
  • Physiology 165
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
Replace Ali M. Yurasek with:
Ali M. Yurasek United States
Shannon A. Byrne United States
Doris Ogden United States
Tera L. Fazzino United States
Michele A. DeBiasse United States
Danielle M. Morabito United States
Donna M. LaPaglia United States
Courtney M. Monroe United States
Linda S. Vara United States
Elizabeth C. Temple Australia
Steven E. Meredith relative to Ali M. Yurasek United States Ali M. Yurasek's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.2×
Ali M. Yurasek · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven E. Meredith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven E. Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven E. Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven E. Meredith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven E. Meredith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven E. Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven E. Meredith. The network helps show where Steven E. Meredith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven E. Meredith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven E. Meredith Line = papers co-authored together Steven E. Meredith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013137
2 200860
3 201456
4 201155
5 201545
6 201435
7 201528
8 201323
9 201523
10 201917
11 201915
12 201413
13 201712
14 202012
15 201710
16 20189
17 20227
18 20155
19 20175
20
Contingency management in substance abuse treatment.
20124

About Steven E. Meredith

Steven E. Meredith is a scholar working on Physiology, Pharmacology, Epidemiology, Family Practice and General Decision Sciences, having authored 25 papers that have together received 578 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (12 papers), Coffee research and impacts (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (1 paper), Analytical Methods in Pharmaceuticals (1 paper) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (32 citations), Applied Psychology (54 citations), Pharmacology (122 citations), Physiology (165 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations). Steven E. Meredith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jesse Dallery, Roland R. Griffiths, Laura M. Juliano, John R. Hughes, Nancy M. Petry, Michael J. Grabinski, Sheila M. Alessi, Mary Margaret Sweeney, Brantley P. Jarvis and Bethany R. Raiff. Their work appears in journals such as Nicotine & Tobacco Research, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis and Behavioural Brain Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact