Steven C. Ames

40 papers receiving 678 citations

Peers

Steven C. Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Applied Psychology 146
  • Physiology 228
  • Clinical Psychology 157
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
  • General Health Professions 140
Replace Karen O. Brandon with:
Karen O. Brandon United States
S E Marcus United States
Natalie Schüz Australia
Mathieu Gourlan France
Alison Beck Australia
Erika Litvin Bloom United States
Candice D. Donaldson United States
M. Carmen Míguez Spain
Beate Gaertner Germany
Jay E. Earles United States
Steven C. Ames relative to Karen O. Brandon United States Karen O. Brandon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Karen O. Brandon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven C. Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven C. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven C. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven C. Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven C. Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven C. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven C. Ames. The network helps show where Steven C. Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven C. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven C. Ames Line = papers co-authored together Steven C. Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200557
2 200454
3 200852
4 200142
5 200936
6 201236
7 200535
8 200132
9 200028
10 201026
11 200725
12 201025
13 201423
14 201022
15 200818
16 201018
17 200517
18 199915
19 200814
20 200112

About Steven C. Ames

Steven C. Ames is a scholar working on Physiology, Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (15 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Mental Health via Writing (3 papers) and Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (146 citations), Physiology (228 citations), Clinical Psychology (157 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations) and General Health Professions (140 citations). Steven C. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Christi A. Patten, Darrell R. Schroeder, Chudley E. Werch, Kenneth P. Offord, Phillip J. Brantley, Steven B. Pokorny, David O. Warner, Glenn N. Jones, Dennis L. Thombs and Michele Moore. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Substance Use & Misuse, Psycho-Oncology, Addictive Behaviors and Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact