Steven C. Ames

41 papers receiving 705 citations

Peers

Steven C. Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Applied Psychology 74
  • Physiology 211
  • Clinical Psychology 115
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 61
  • General Health Professions 80
Replace Karen O. Brandon with:
Karen O. Brandon United States
S E Marcus United States
M. Carmen Míguez Spain
Michael Flores United States
Natalie Schüz Australia
Duck‐Hee Kang United States
Helen Lindner Australia
Erika Litvin Bloom United States
Diana R. Keith United States
Eleanor Z. Hanna United States
Steven C. Ames relative to Karen O. Brandon United States Karen O. Brandon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Karen O. Brandon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven C. Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven C. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven C. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven C. Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven C. Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven C. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven C. Ames. The network helps show where Steven C. Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steven C. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven C. Ames Line = papers co-authored together Steven C. Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200557
2 200455
3 200852
4 200145
5 200537
6 201236
7 200936
8 200133
9 200029
10 201027
11 201026
12 200725
13 201424
14 201022
15 201018
16 200818
17 200518
18 200815
19 199915
20 199913

About Steven C. Ames

Steven C. Ames is a scholar working on Physiology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Oncology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 737 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (13 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers), Mental Health via Writing (3 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (74 citations), Physiology (211 citations), Clinical Psychology (115 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (61 citations) and General Health Professions (80 citations). Steven C. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Christi A. Patten, Darrell R. Schroeder, Chudley E. Werch, Kenneth P. Offord, Phillip J. Brantley, Steven B. Pokorny, David O. Warner, Glenn N. Jones, Dennis L. Thombs and Hui Bian. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Behavioral Medicine, Addictive Behaviors, Psycho-Oncology, Substance Use & Misuse and Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact