Gretchen E. Ames

868 citations
32 papers · 657 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Gretchen E. Ames

32 papers receiving 636 citations

Peers

Gretchen E. Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Pharmacy 121
  • Clinical Psychology 220
  • Applied Psychology 41
  • Surgery 226
  • Physiology 104
Replace Seema M. Patidar with:
Seema M. Patidar United States
Lisa K. Diewald United States
Karen W. Huskey United States
T. A. Wadden United States
Kerrin Brelje United States
B. Gabriel Smolarz United States
Billy White United Kingdom
Kevin W Lutz United States
Kajsa Järvholm Sweden
Audrina J. Bunton United States
Gretchen E. Ames relative to Seema M. Patidar United States Seema M. Patidar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Seema M. Patidar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gretchen E. Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gretchen E. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gretchen E. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gretchen E. Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gretchen E. Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gretchen E. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gretchen E. Ames. The network helps show where Gretchen E. Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gretchen E. Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gretchen E. Ames Line = papers co-authored together Gretchen E. Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012105
2 2003100
3 201564
4 200551
5 201851
6 201545
7 201026
8 202023
9 202119
10 202119
11 201018
12 200818
13 202215
14 201213
15 202012
16 201410
17 201710
18 201110
19 20098
20 20148

About Gretchen E. Ames

Gretchen E. Ames is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy and Physiology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 657 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (9 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (9 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (7 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (4 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (121 citations), Clinical Psychology (220 citations), Applied Psychology (41 citations), Surgery (226 citations) and Physiology (104 citations). Gretchen E. Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Matthew M. Clark, Karen Grothe, Michael G. Heckman, Afton M. Koball, Maria L. Collazo–Clavell, Todd A. Kellogg, Donald E. Williams, Bruno M. Balsiger, Christopher D. Sletten and Haitham S. Abu-Lebdeh. Their work appears in journals such as Eating Behaviors, Obesity Surgery, The American Surgeon, Mayo Clinic Proceedings and SpringerPlus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact