Steve Koh

591 citations
16 papers · 262 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 2
    • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies 2
    • Health and Well-being Studies 1
    • Mental Health Treatment and Access 3

Steve Koh

16 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers

Steve Koh
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Applied Psychology 20
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 48
  • Clinical Psychology 70
  • Health 24
  • Social Psychology 59
Replace Arun Enara with:
Arun Enara India
Ana Antunes Portugal
Hamed Al Sinawi Oman
Raquel Losada Spain
Martine Vallarino Italy
Xiaolian Tu China
Natarajan Varadharajan India
Magdalena Leszko Poland
Werdie van Staden South Africa
Vanesa Peinado Spain
Steve Koh relative to Arun Enara India Arun Enara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Arun Enara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Koh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Koh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Koh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Koh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Koh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Koh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Koh. The network helps show where Steve Koh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Koh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Koh Line = papers co-authored together Steve Koh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201453
2 201334
3 201933
4 200329
5 201728
6 201328
7 202018
8 201915
9 20145
10 20105
11 20125
12 20193
13 20222
14 20152
15 20221
16 20121

About Steve Koh

Steve Koh is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (2 papers), Social Media in Health Education (2 papers), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper) and Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (20 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (48 citations), Clinical Psychology (70 citations), Health (24 citations) and Social Psychology (59 citations). Steve Koh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Sudan and Australia. Frequent co-authors include David W. Oslin, Beth Goldman, Michael B. First, Lisa B. Dixon, David A. Adler, Ganesamoorthy Subbanagounder, Judith A. Berliner, David Cochran, Venkat Bhat and Subroto Chatterjee. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Psychiatric Services, Psychiatric Quarterly, BMC Medical Education and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact