Beth Goldman

483 citations
22 papers · 366 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Beth Goldman

21 papers receiving 302 citations

Peers

Beth Goldman
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Clinical Psychology 89
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 60
  • Social Psychology 74
  • General Health Professions 65
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 56
Replace Shirley L. Wu with:
Shirley L. Wu United States
Heike S. Englert Germany
Damon S. Tweedy United States
Ayşe Ergün Türkiye
Janet K. Spittlehouse New Zealand
Hans A. Diehl United States
Arlinda B. Moreno Brazil
Lee Lipsenthal United States
Susan L. Colles Australia
Samuel A. Danquah Ghana
Beth Goldman relative to Shirley L. Wu United States Shirley L. Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×
Shirley L. Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beth Goldman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beth Goldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beth Goldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beth Goldman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beth Goldman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beth Goldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beth Goldman. The network helps show where Beth Goldman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Beth Goldman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beth Goldman Line = papers co-authored together Beth Goldman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992102
2 201453
3 200947
4 201329
5 201728
6 202018
7 201915
8 200715
9 200414
10
Variables in patient satisfaction with medical care.
197510
11
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults: Clinical Information for Primary Care Physicians
20047
12 20195
13 19865
14 20094
15 20114
16 20183
17 20102
18 20212
19 20101
20 20121

About Beth Goldman

Beth Goldman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers) and Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (89 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (60 citations), Social Psychology (74 citations), General Health Professions (65 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (56 citations). Beth Goldman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include David W. Oslin, Lisa B. Dixon, Michael B. First, Samuel G. Siris, David A. Adler, Steve Koh, Jeffrey L. Berlant, Ann L. Hackman, Rebecca A. Dulit and David A. Adler. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatric Services, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, JAMA, Medical Care Research and Review and Psychiatric Annals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact