Steve Ellner

2.2k citations
125 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Steve Ellner

101 papers receiving 868 citations

Peers

Steve Ellner
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Political Science and International Relations 675
  • Linguistics and Language 110
  • Development 57
  • Sociology and Political Science 575
  • Public Administration 40
Replace John P. Hoover with:
John P. Hoover United States
Charles King United Kingdom
Franklin W. Knight United States
Peter Worsley Australia
Royce Carroll United Kingdom
Donna Lee Van Cott United States
Thomas Spear United States
David Brokensha United States
Jon Abbink Netherlands
Piet Konings Netherlands
Steve Ellner relative to John P. Hoover United States John P. Hoover's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
John P. Hoover · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Ellner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Ellner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Ellner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Ellner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Ellner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Ellner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Ellner. The network helps show where Steve Ellner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Steve Ellner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Ellner Line = papers co-authored together Steve Ellner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004234
2 200871
3 201156
4 200356
5 200343
6 201139
7 200235
8 201033
9 201433
10 199427
11 200923
12 200522
13 201321
14 200121
15 201720
16 200418
17 199416
18 201816
19 199416
20 200415

About Steve Ellner

Steve Ellner is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Linguistics and Language, Demography and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, having authored 125 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Politics and Society in Latin America (58 papers), Latin American socio-political dynamics (37 papers), Cultural and political discourse analysis (35 papers), Political and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America (22 papers), International Relations in Latin America (18 papers), Political Theory and Democracy (8 papers), Populism, Right-Wing Movements (7 papers) and History and Politics in Latin America (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (675 citations), Linguistics and Language (110 citations), Development (57 citations), Sociology and Political Science (575 citations) and Public Administration (40 citations). Steve Ellner has collaborated with scholars based in Venezuela, United States and El Salvador. Frequent co-authors include Damarys Canache, Nancy Baron, Leah R. Gerber, Kiho Kim, Richard B. Aronson, Joseph H. Connell, C. Drew Harvell, Hamish McCallum, Mercedes Pascual and Armand M. Kuris. Their work appears in journals such as Latin American Perspectives, Hispanic American Historical Review, Journal of Latin American Studies, Latin American Politics and Society and Latin American Research Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact