Stephen W. Michael
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Papers in
-
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 9
-
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 6
- Co-authors
- Christian A. Meissner (7 shared papers)Jacqueline R. Evans (6 shared papers)Susan Brandon (2 shared papers)Siegfried L. Sporer (1 shared paper)Allison D. Redlich (1 shared paper)Jonathan P. Vallano (2 shared papers)Kyle C Scherr (2 shared papers)Kyle J. Susa (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Psychology Public Policy and Law (2 papers)Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition (1 paper)Applied Cognitive Psychology (1 paper)Journal of Experimental Criminology (1 paper)Criminal Justice and Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Stephen W. Michael
12 papers receiving 424 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Social Psychology 400
- Clinical Psychology 206
- Cognitive Neuroscience 154
- Sociology and Political Science 167
- Artificial Intelligence 87
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen W. Michael
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen W. Michael's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen W. Michael with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen W. Michael more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen W. Michael
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen W. Michael. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen W. Michael. The network helps show where Stephen W. Michael may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Stephen W. Michael, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 155 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 118 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 72 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 11 | Brief Report: Narrative Qualities and Perceptions of Generated Alibis | 2011 | 5 |
| 12 | 2020 | 1 |
About Stephen W. Michael
Stephen W. Michael is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (9 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (6 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (4 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (1 paper), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper), Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity (1 paper) and Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (400 citations), Clinical Psychology (206 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (154 citations), Sociology and Political Science (167 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (87 citations). Stephen W. Michael has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Christian A. Meissner, Jacqueline R. Evans, Susan Brandon, Siegfried L. Sporer, Allison D. Redlich, Jonathan P. Vallano, Kyle C Scherr, Kyle J. Susa, Marianna Carlucci and J. Zoe Klemfuss. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology Public Policy and Law, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Journal of Experimental Criminology and Criminal Justice and Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.