Ellen Wessel

484 citations
10 papers · 344 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Deception detection and forensic psychology 8
    • Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research 1
    • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies 6

Ellen Wessel

9 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Ellen Wessel
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Gender Studies 152
  • Social Psychology 222
  • Law 92
  • Clinical Psychology 117
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 84
Replace Douglas J. Narby with:
Douglas J. Narby United States
Kimberly D. Richman United States
Lora M. Levett United States
Liza Zvi Israel
Natalie Martschuk Australia
Kathryn Sperry United States
Jennifer Groscup United States
Julie Dempsey Canada
Christine L. Ruva United States
Fadia M. Narchet United States
Ellen Wessel relative to Douglas J. Narby United States Douglas J. Narby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Douglas J. Narby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ellen Wessel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ellen Wessel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ellen Wessel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ellen Wessel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ellen Wessel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ellen Wessel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ellen Wessel. The network helps show where Ellen Wessel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Ellen Wessel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ellen Wessel Line = papers co-authored together Ellen Wessel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2002138
2 200666
3 200632
4 200926
5 201325
6 201120
7 201513
8 201312
9 201611
10 20191

About Ellen Wessel

Ellen Wessel is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Gender Studies, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 344 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (8 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (6 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (3 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (2 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper) and Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (152 citations), Social Psychology (222 citations), Law (92 citations), Clinical Psychology (117 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (84 citations). Ellen Wessel has collaborated with scholars based in Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Svein Magnussen, Dag Erik Eilertsen, Geir Kaufmann, Geir Overskeid, Annika Melinder and Karl Halvor Teigen. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Cognitive Psychology, Psychology Crime and Law, Law and Human Behavior, Behavioral Sciences & the Law and Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact