Stephen Till

628 citations
30 papers · 533 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Synthesis and Biological Evaluation
    • Multicomponent Synthesis of Heterocycles
    • Synthesis and biological activity
    • Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions
    • Ocular and Laser Science Research

Papers in

Stephen Till

30 papers receiving 516 citations

Peers

Stephen Till
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Organic Chemistry 329
  • Ophthalmology 62
  • Polymers and Plastics 47
  • Inorganic Chemistry 36
  • Instrumentation 8
Replace Ruben D. Fonseca with:
Ruben D. Fonseca Brazil
T. Xia United States
I. Yu. Denisyuk Russia
D. Guichaoua France
Z.-Y. Hu United States
Kenji Omote Japan
Yuya Inaba Japan
Christiane Carré France
N. Furukawa Japan
Pallavi V. Teredesai India
Stephen Till relative to Ruben D. Fonseca Brazil Ruben D. Fonseca's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Ruben D. Fonseca · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Till

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Till's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Till with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Till more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Till

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Till. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Till. The network helps show where Stephen Till may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Till, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Till Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Till links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001338
2 200032
3 198219
4 200016
5 201915
6 200813
7 19838
8 19858
9 19937
10 20007
11 19807
12 20036
13 20066
14 19855
15 20135
16 19914
17 19964
18 19914
19 20044
20 19904

About Stephen Till

Stephen Till is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Ophthalmology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, having authored 30 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (9 papers), Ocular and Laser Science Research (7 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (5 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Nonlinear Optical Materials Studies (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers) and Thermal and Kinetic Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (329 citations), Ophthalmology (62 citations), Polymers and Plastics (47 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (36 citations) and Instrumentation (8 citations). Stephen Till has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include E. L. Wood, R.J. Peace, S. Dailey, W. J. Feast, I. Sage, D C Herbert, Ian W. Parsons, Paul L. Coe, Bruce E. Stuck and Paul K. Kennedy. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Microelectronic Engineering, Journal of Laser Applications, Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1 and Computer Physics Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact