Stephen Stacey

601 citations
44 papers · 382 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Stacey

40 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

Stephen Stacey
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Surgery 278
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 134
  • Emergency Medicine 41
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 36
  • Urology 20
Replace Kathryn L. Loftis with:
Kathryn L. Loftis United States
Julian Cooper United Kingdom
Brent Emigh United States
Stuart Matthews United Kingdom
N J Madeley United Kingdom
Yasuki Motozawa Japan
Cameron Barr United States
Florian Heß Switzerland
Jamie L. Moore United States
Peter P. Hsiue United States
Stephen Stacey relative to Kathryn L. Loftis United States Kathryn L. Loftis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kathryn L. Loftis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Stacey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Stacey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Stacey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Stacey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Stacey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Stacey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Stacey. The network helps show where Stephen Stacey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Stacey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Stacey Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Stacey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202040
2 200636
3 200830
4 201727
5 202122
6 202121
7 201620
8 200817
9 202216
10 202215
11 200813
12 202010
13 202010
14 20239
15 20239
16 20228
17
Evaluating Pediatric Abdominal Injuries
20057
18 20217
19 20215
20 20225

About Stephen Stacey

Stephen Stacey is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 44 papers that have together received 382 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (19 papers), Pregnancy-related medical research (10 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (9 papers), Hip disorders and treatments (6 papers), Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (6 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (6 papers), Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (4 papers) and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (278 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (134 citations), Emergency Medicine (41 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (36 citations) and Urology (20 citations). Stephen Stacey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Qatar and China. Frequent co-authors include Cyril Mauffrey, Joshua A. Parry, Richard W. Kent, Austin Heare, Motasem Salameh, Kristy B. Arbogast, William A. Woods, Jason Forman, Kazuo Higuchi and Michael M. Hadeed. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, Injury, Journal of Biomechanics and International Orthopaedics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact