Stephen Schiller

922 citations
50 papers · 523 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Schiller

46 papers receiving 494 citations

Peers

Stephen Schiller
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Media Technology 158
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 35
  • Instrumentation 32
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 170
  • Aerospace Engineering 139
Replace Zhen Ye with:
Zhen Ye China
Yu Tao China
Aurélien Plyer France
Wenyue Zhu China
Emmett J. Ientilucci United States
Patrick Héas France
Bernard Rougé France
Gwendoline Blanchet France
Stephen Schiller relative to Zhen Ye China Zhen Ye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Zhen Ye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Schiller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Schiller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Schiller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Schiller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Schiller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Schiller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Schiller. The network helps show where Stephen Schiller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Schiller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Schiller Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Schiller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013115
2 200363
3 199838
4 201731
5 201725
6 201721
7 199620
8 201917
9 198715
10 199515
11 201614
12 201012
13 199712
14 198810
15 201910
16 20179
17 20018
18 20208
19 19948
20 20037

About Stephen Schiller

Stephen Schiller is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Computational Mechanics and Instrumentation, having authored 50 papers that have together received 523 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Calibration and Measurement Techniques (16 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (10 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (9 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (9 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (6 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (5 papers), Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (4 papers) and Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Media Technology (158 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (35 citations), Instrumentation (32 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (170 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (139 citations). Stephen Schiller has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Scott Cohen, Xiang Zhu, Peyman Milanfar, E. F. Milone, Kurtis J. Thome, Michelle Kelly, Mary Pagnutti, Robert Ryan, Ken‐ichi Arai and J. E. Conel. Their work appears in journals such as The Astronomical Journal, Remote Sensing of Environment, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Measurement and Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact