Stephen Schecter

72 papers receiving 790 citations

Peers

Stephen Schecter
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Applied Mathematics 254
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 287
  • Geometry and Topology 187
  • Mathematical Physics 174
  • Numerical Analysis 92
Replace Hansjörg Kielhöfer with:
Hansjörg Kielhöfer Germany
Bernd Aulbach Germany
Chongchun Zeng United States
Victor Iosifovich Yudovich Russia
Daniel Michelson Israel
Jürgen Scheurle Germany
Michele V. Bartuccelli United Kingdom
Masaya Yamaguti Japan
Giorgio Fusco Italy
Thomas Wanner United States
Stephen Schecter relative to Hansjörg Kielhöfer Germany Hansjörg Kielhöfer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Hansjörg Kielhöfer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Schecter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Schecter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Schecter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Schecter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Schecter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Schecter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Schecter. The network helps show where Stephen Schecter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Schecter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Schecter Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Schecter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198783
2 199660
3 198559
4 198353
5 200752
6 200429
7 200726
8 199326
9 201522
10 200422
11 201021
12 199121
13 200220
14 201020
15 201019
16 200319
17 199318
18 200617
19 198716
20 199515

About Stephen Schecter

Stephen Schecter is a scholar working on Applied Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 79 papers that have together received 921 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (18 papers), Navier-Stokes equation solutions (17 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (16 papers), Stability and Controllability of Differential Equations (15 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (11 papers), Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (10 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (9 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (254 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (287 citations), Geometry and Topology (187 citations), Mathematical Physics (174 citations) and Numerical Analysis (92 citations). Stephen Schecter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Austria. Frequent co-authors include D. Marchesin, Anna Ghazaryan, Bradley J. Plohr, Michael Büchner, Jerrold Eldon Marsden, Michael F. Singer, Michael Shearer, Yuri Latushkin, Peter Szmolyan and Herbert M. Gintis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Differential Equations, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, Journal of Mathematical Economics and Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact